From the BlogSubscribe Now

Why the Nikon D800 May Not Be Right For You

The Nikon D800 gets plenty of raves and pos­i­tive com­ments, but does that mean it’s the right cam­era for you?

Nikon D800Now that I’ve had the Nikon D800 for a few weeks, I’m get­ting more com­fort­able with it — both for the good and the bad. Yes, it has lus­cious images with incred­i­ble detail, but there’s also a dark side to the Nikon D800. Things that its fans don’t like to men­tion, or per­haps dis­miss as incon­se­quen­tial. While some of these issues may very well be incon­se­quen­tial to them, they could be real deal-​breakers for another photographer.

Here’s a list of some issues you may not like about the Nikon D800.

It’s Expen­sive

Despite a recent $200 price drop (and that may be tem­po­rary), the Nikon D800 is still a rather expen­sive cam­era at $2795. For many of us, that’s quite a hefty invest­ment to make. Bear in mind that invest­ment may only be part of the pic­ture. If you’re a fan of adding a bat­tery grip, as I am, then you can tack on another $389 for the Nikon MB-​D12. You can get a third-​party grip for less money — and appar­ently lower qual­ity. If you use a Really Right Stuff or other brand of L-​Plate bracket, look for another $200. Of course, these prices are all pre-​tax and we still haven’t put a lens on the cam­era yet.

It’s Heavy

If you’re used to car­ry­ing a DSLR of this class, the weight may not be an issue for you. If you’re mov­ing up from a smaller DSLR or other type of cam­era, then you need to be pre­pared to lug this puppy around with you. Sure, it feels fine when you first pick it up. It’s like a new baby and every­one knows that new­born baby poop doesn’t stink. After you’ve changed a few dia­pers. the per­cep­tion changes. Plug in the bat­tery, add a grip and carry it around all day and then you’ll start to feel the weight.

It’s a Resource Hog

You may have read that the Nikon D800 is a 36 megapixel cam­era, but do you really under­stand what that means?

  • You only get 200 shots on a 16GB card. My D700 gets over 600 on the same card
  • Those files are much slower to down­load from your card to your computer
  • Load­ing an image in your post-​processing soft­ware takes three times as long (as does sav­ing it)

A RAW file from my Nikon D700 is 25MB. A RAW file from my Nikon D800 is 75mb. You do have an option to mit­i­gate this a bit using NEF com­pres­sion. The Loss­less com­pres­sion option with reduce those file sizes from 75MB down to 38-​50MB. Nikon’s com­pres­sion method is “vir­tu­ally loss­less”, mean­ing that it only throws away bits that are out­side of the visual spec­trum. That’s why the file sizes vary so much — the com­pres­sion depends upon the infor­ma­tion gath­ered in each shot. In most cases, I wouldn’t worry about it. If you’re a wed­ding pho­tog­ra­pher who needs to absolutely assure that all of the high­light infor­ma­tion in a wed­ding gown remains present with­out pos­ter­i­za­tion, then keep using the full-​sized NEF file.

You’re going to need to con­sider how these files will affect your com­puter when you down­load them. Do you have enough disk space to store them? Do you have suf­fi­cient mem­ory to process them? The Nikon D800 can cap­ture glo­ri­ous 14-​bit detail, which means you should use 16-​bit pro­cess­ing to retain that data. That may put a bit more bur­den on your CPU and GPU to push those pix­els around. How much space are you using with your pho­tos right now?

Would you have enough room if they were three times as large? The cost of this cam­era may increase as you buy more resources to sup­port the larger files it cre­ates. Sure, you can tell your­self that you’ll delete more images to save space. That takes time, though. One way or another, you’re going to pay for those 36 megapixels.

The “Oh, Yeah” Moments

There are times when I just get a shot with a bor­ing sky. I don’t mind com­posit­ing a bet­ter sky into the shot. In fact, I’ve got a lovely col­lec­tion of sky and cloud pho­tos that I’d taken with my Nikon D700 over the years. When I loaded one of those images to use on a scene that I shot with the Nikon D800, this is what I saw.

Nikon D800 vs Nikon D700

Oh, yeah. That’s not going to work because the full sized image from the D700 is three times smaller than the Nikon D800 image. I could stretch it, but then it looks stretched. Hey, it’s a good rea­son to own onOne Soft­ware’s Per­fect Resize, though.

The Nikon D800 Isn’t All Bad News

If it sounds like I’m try­ing to con­vince you that you shouldn’t buy the Nikon D800, I’m not. It’s a won­der­ful cam­era and I really am glad I bought it. What I would like to do is make sure that you’re aware of the draw­backs that go along with this DSLR. The thing that makes it great is that you can cap­ture a lot of detail and infor­ma­tion. That’s also the same thing that will eat up your resources. You just need to be aware that this is a dif­fer­ent beast than you may have used in the past.

Dockside Diner

Embed This Image On Your Site (copy code below):

About William

Author, Photographer and IT Manager. I have a fondness for chocolate. I also own Suburbia Press and Aperture vs Lightroom.

  • http://www.facebook.com/al.kawasaki.9 Al Kawasaki

    Good points about the real costs and 3x image file size dif­fer­ences. I remem­ber play­ing this won­der­ful game with D2hs 4.2mp, D2x 12mp. The 3x jump from 4 to 12mp was a real expen­sive sur­prise after CF cards and hard drive quickly filled. The jump from D3 12mp to D4 16mp, has less effect so far.

    • http://www.orlandolocal.com William Beem

      In a few years, per­haps 36 megapix­els won’t mat­ter very much — just as the jump from 4MP to 12MP doesn’t seem so sig­nif­i­cant now. Think about it. I have 64GB on my iPhone. When I started out with my first Apple prod­uct, I was sol­der­ing my own mem­ory boards just to add another 16K RAM and my 5MB Apple Pro­file drive was con­sid­ered HUGE (both in size and stor­age capac­ity).
      The thing is that we’re liv­ing now and, for some folks, these are con­cerns that they ought to con­sider before buying.

  • Steve Thomas

    I believe this is a mat­ter of prospec­tive. The D800 is the first cam­era to jump into a qual­ity level that com­pares with medium for­mat cam­eras. So is it expensive?.…No! Its actu­ally down right cheap. Is it heavy? In com­par­i­son its the light­est cam­era at this qual­ity level. And of course this level of detail requires big files. If you have worked with dig­i­tal medium for­mat cam­eras you can appre­ci­ate how ground break­ing the cam­era is. I loved my D700, but I would never go back after work­ing with the D800. Do you think we will see a D4X with 54mp?

    • http://www.orlandolocal.com William Beem

      True, but con­sider the per­spec­tive of some­one who hasn’t used one of the top-​end cam­eras, rather than some­one com­par­ing it to a medium for­mat cam­era that he or she never con­sid­ered. If you’re mov­ing up from one of the smaller DSLR cam­eras to the D800, these are some pretty big issues. Com­par­ing a $3000 cam­era to a $500 cam­era is quite a jump. Mov­ing down from a $50K camera…well, it’s a dream!