Photo Friday – They Don’t Speak a Lick of German

They Don't Speak a Lick of German - © Copyright 2010 by William Beem

The Flickr Response

Here’s the response I received from Flickr support today.

Hello William,

Thank you for contacting Flickr Customer Care.

Im sorry that your photo was uploaded to a blog when your personal
setting say that you dont want that;but as you said if you share a
photo that you marked as private with a group you are a member of, it’s
as if other group members have full access to that photo. They can add
comments, notes, and tags, (everything other than blogging) regardless
of the photo’s privacy setting.

The photo isn’t displayed for people who aren’t members of the group.

Your photo retains the privacy settings you set for anyone who isn’t a
group member. It also stays in your photostream, available to everyone
who can view it. You (or a group administrator) can remove your photo
from the pool at any time.

You can modify your settings here:

http://www.flickr.com/account/prefs/blogging/?from=privacy

Only you and the group administrators can remove a photo from a group
pool. You can easily remove your photo from groups that it has been
added to.

Go to the photo page. Then, on the bottom-right of the screen, you will
see a list of all the groups/pools that this photo belongs to.

Click on the “X” next to the name of the group that you’d like this
photo removed from. That should do the trick.

I apologize for all the inconveniences this may have caused you.

Thank you again for contacting us. If you have any other questions,
please feel free to reply to this email.

Regards,

[Name Redacted]
Flickr Customer Care

Basically, your wishes come in last with regard to Flickr account settings of your photos.  I loaded the image into several groups. I have no idea which ones specifically allow blogging or not.  There doesn’t seem to be any indication to what groups do to override your account settings.

There’s another loop, too.  One of the people who commented on my photo noticed that the blog in question seems to be just importing the RSS feed for a group and posting the results on the blog.  Technically simple, but it demonstrates that Flickr has a lot of holes that override your account settings.

Flickr Lies

Portofino Sunset - © Copyright 2010 by William Beem

Once again, Flickr is annoying me.  I have my account settings to limit blogging of my images.  According to the settings, I should be the only one who can blog them from Flickr.  Seems simple, right?

Flickr Blogging Settings

Imagine my surprise when I received a comment on Flickr telling me that they saw my image on this site:  http://www.thatsorlando.com/portofino-sunset/2010/07/

I don’t blame the blogger.  Apparently, there is a “thats” blog for many cities.  I don’t see any advertising on the blog, but that’s not really the issue here.  The issue is one of trust.  When Flickr offers account settings that say one thing and yet allows the service to disregard those settings, it’s a breech of trust.  Apparently, putting your photos in a Flickr group allows the people who view that group to override your individual account settings.  That’s exceptionally stupid, but such is the way Flickr works.

I sent a note to Flickr support about the issue, but I’m not holding my breath.  When I’ve made complaints about the way their site works in the past, they dismissed the issue by saying that Flickr is a sharing site.  Apparently, the users are not in charge of determining how their own photos are shared, but Flickr gives them a placebo-effect in their account settings.

Don’t trust Flickr to honor the account settings you make on the service.

The Joy of Workshops

Jordan - © Copyright 2010 by William Beem

Last fall, I wrote about a good experience I had attending a workshop put on by my friends John & Susan at Cuba Libre.  They run Harmon’s School of Photography and regularly have classes ranging a wide spectrum of photography – basics of photography, courses on Lightroom, small flash lighting to studio lighting courses are all regular staples.  The workshops that I enjoy are when they go out in the field.  The shot of Jordan (above) is one I took during one of their workshops last year for a swimsuit session.  It was hot, muggy and rained on us, but I had a great time.

The Pool Sessions are an annual event for them and I’ve signed up again this year.  That means within a few weeks, I’ll be posting more bikini shots here than HDR.  The conditions are brutal, but I suffer for my art.

Fortunately, the next workshop after that is a bit more accommodating.  They’ve arranged for a September workshop with body-builders and fitness models in a local gym.  I’m guessing that it’s the same gym that John and I go to, but I’ll find out soon enough.  That means sometime in September I’ll have more portraits of good-looking people to post.  One of my objectives for that shoot is to try some edge lighting to illustrate the body’s definition.

When that thought crossed my mind, I realized that it means I’m slightly progressing in my objectives for attending workshops.  In the past, I’d hear about something that sounds interesting and show up hoping to get a good shot.  That’s not exactly a recipe for success.  Others have harped on me to pre-visualize and I’ve shared that advice here on the blog.  In fact, it’s something I’ve done on other parts of my photography while wandering around on my own.

It gives me a mild dilemma. too.  Scott Kelby recently posted a note on his blog about people who come to workshops intent on showing how much they know (read his post to put that in the right context).  I left a comment there essentially stating that I like going to workshops as the dumbest guy in the room.  I want to learn.  I want to have an open mind to get what the instructor is sharing, rather than try to show how much I know (which is debatable) or hijack the course to get what I want.

In this case, I think the idea of doing some edge lighting is a good fit for the bodybuilder workshop.  I’ll discuss it with John & Susan to let them know my interest.  It may fit well into what they intend to teach, and I’ll get the shot I’ve envisioned.  If they decline, then I’ll learn focus on learning what they have to share.  Here’s my point:  It’s good to think ahead and have ideas about what you want to get out of a workshop, but don’t disrupt the flow of the instructor’s plans.  In other words, don’t be that guy.  You know, the one who causes the other attendees to roll their eyes because he just won’t leave something alone.  There’s no sense in wasting everyone else’s time just to get what you want.  It’s selfish.

I’ve been to workshops with that guy before and it just bugs me.  I’ve also been to workshops where everyone got along very well and everything was a joy.  Fortunately, that’s the kind of class I usually find with John & Susan.  If you’re in the Central Florida area, I’d recommend clicking the link above to check out their training schedule.  Maybe I’ll see you at one of the workshops.

The Impact of a Snapshot

Over the weekend, I was doing a little research into my family name.  My Aunt Dorothy collected a fair amount of Beem family genealogy and shared it with me.  I know that my own brand of the family tree has been in America for quite a while. The story goes that one of my ancestors (George Beem) was an aide to General Washington in the Revolutionary War.  I’m skeptical.  Just imagine how many people claim to have ancestors connecting with Washington.  However, it does seem to flow down a bit:

  • George Beem fathered Benjamin Beem in 1790
  • Benjamin fathers George Washington Beem
  • G.W. fathered Seth P.
  • Seth fathered Stanley Robbin
  • S.R. fathered Stanley Robert
  • I’m next.

Although I haven’t really established the connection yet, I believe that George Beem at the top of the list is a descendent of Michael Beem who immigrated from Germany.  It’s easy to understand how some of these old records can disappear over time, but I’m more impressed by how often you can find a historical record that’s been kept for centuries.

What does this have to do with photography? I found something that possibly takes my family history in a different direction.  It’s the story of two children who died in the Holocaust at Auschwitz.

Abraham en Eva Beem

Abraham and Eva lived in The Netherlands, children of parents who were active in the Jewish community.  Their parents, Hartog & Rosetta Beem went into hiding and sent their children to Christian friends to live under assumed names.  It worked for a couple of years until they were betrayed.  The Germans paid rewards to people who turned in Jews.  One night, police came to arrest the children and their foster parents.  They claimed they weren’t Jewish, so the police forced young Abraham to undress and his penis gave them away.

Abraham and Eva were murdered in Auschwitz on 6 March, 1944.

Their story, like so many others during the war, is tragic and heartbreaking. I’ve always had an interest in history and have read numerous reports just like this one. The difference is that I’ve always read them before as an outsider, looking in at someone else’s story. For the first time, I’ve come across a Holocaust story that very likely has a connection to my own family.  Had it just been a story with the name “Beem”, I would’ve been intrigued.  The part that drives this home is the photograph.

I look at these two children and I instantly see family features.  The book my Aunt Dorothy sent is full of family photos and it’s not hard to pick out the folks with a Beem family gene compared to their other loved ones in the images.  It’s no different than looking in the mirror and seeing parts of my father in the reflection.  We’re an unmistakable lot.

Eva Beem c. 1942

I wouldn’t have this connection had it not been for the photographs. Yes, our common family name tells me that there’s likely a connection, but actually seeing someone with those family features drives the story home for me.

Our family photographs, even snapshots, may have impact on someone else in the future. I’m in a very different line of the family, but the images make me feel close to people who were long past before I was ever born.

It also raises some questions for my own history. For one thing, I’ve never heard any mention of our family being Jewish. It makes me wonder if there was a split before part of the family moved to America, or if the difference came from other issues.

I may not be able to prove the link in our families.  As I mentioned, I’m having a hard time establishing the link to Michael Beem, which would seem necessary to establish a line down to the Dutch Beem family. On the other hand, I don’t feel that I have to prove it in writing now.  The photograph tells me everything I need to know that the connection is real.

July 26, 2010 - 2:32 AM

Shamu - Ah HA!

We will be going to eat at a deli the next time you visit.

July 26, 2010 - 2:34 AM

Shamu - Ah HA!

You realize what this means, no? The next time you visit, we eat lunch at a delicatessen.

M o r e   i n f o